Michael Mundia Kamau
P.O. Box 58972
00200 City Square
Nairobi
Kenya

5th January 2005

   THE POWER TO READ, AND ALL THAT APPERTAINS…….

The results of the 2004 Kenya Certificate of Primary
Education (K.C.P.E.), released by Education Minister
George Saitoti on 29th December 2004, further disclose
vicious disparities in the education sector in Kenya,
and the nation at large. Debate so far has revolved
around the sterling performance of the minority
privately owned and privately funded schools vis a vis
the dismal performance of the bulk publicly owned and
publicly funded schools. Justifiably, the effect of
free primary education and it’s impact on declining
standards in public schools over the past two years,
has also been addressed.

No regard whatsoever has however been given to the
numerous individuals who will fail to secure further
academic and training opportunities. 657,747
candidates sat the K.C.P.E. examination in 2004, out
of which roughly 200,000 will proceed on to secondary
school and other levels of formal and informal
training. This means that roughly 450,000 individuals
across the nation are about to be cast into obscurity.
Out of the 200,000 that are about to proceed to higher
levels of education and training, a sizeable number of
roughly 50,000 will either not commence at all, or
drop out in between, because of lack of funds.
President Mwai Kibaki’s government therefore has the
immediate task of engaging or employing 500,000 youth.
Unfortunately, many of the remaining 150,000 youth
proceeding to higher levels of education, face the
grim prospect of attaining sub standard accreditation
from an education system that has stalled, having
failed to adopt to fast changing times.

The issues afflicting our fragile nation clearly go
beyond and are about much more than passionate calls
for free primary school education and/or free
secondary school education. Equally unsettling and
disturbing is the fact that majority school leavers
face grim prospects, whether or not ours is a free
education system.

Small impoverished nations like ours cannot afford the
luxury of implementing a free education curriculum. It
is a Herculean demand that is morally, ethically and
economically untenable. Education and training can and
never will be free. To suggest that education be free
is to scorn, completely disrespect and completely
disregard all breakthroughs made by mankind upto this
point. Numerous distinguished generations of mankind
have paid an enormous price over thousands of years,
that have enabled modern day conveniences in medicine,
health, engineering, science, economics, commerce,
communication and travel, inter alia. To suggest that
this knowledge be imparted free on current generations
of mankind, is to among other things, suggest that we
recede back to the days when surgeries were manual,
clumsy, painful and rudimentary in the extreme.

In the first instance, the average primary school
child in the developed world is privileged, with
access to basic necessities. Secondly, in addition to
conventional facilities of education and learning, the
average primary school child in the developed world
has easy access to a wide array of modern electronic
gadgets of learning and communication, including
television, personal computers and the internet. The
developing world is ages away from attaining these
levels, and the average primary school child in Kenya
is severely handicapped when compared to the average
primary school child in the developed world.

State funds and resources in Kenya as elsewhere, are
stretched and cannot suitably and favourably fund a
free primary school education scheme that will be able
to effectively compete with the module in the first
world. Politics and populist decisions aside, Kenyan
society will fund the transformation of the entire
education sector in Kenya in partnership with the
government, if we genuinely care about this country,
it’s youth and it’s future. In previous years, the
government periodically issued 5 year, 10 year and 25
year development plans. Transformation in the Kenyan
education sector clearly falls within a 25 year
development scheme, initially. Even then we would only
have covered a small fraction of a long journey.
Oxford University, Cambridge University and Harvard
University, institutions that many Kenyans glorify and
regularly make reference to, are 909 years old, 796
years old and 369 years old, respectively.

The majority of us have adopted a laid back,
convenient and detached approach to change in this
country, and this must cease. Our continued generous
funding and generous support of fringe activities, is
regrettable and deplorable, in the face of general
nationwide decline, including alarming declines in the
education sector. On the 26th of August 2004 East
African Breweries Limited announced record profits and
a record dividend payment for it’s financial year
ended 30th June 2004. No less than President Mwai
Kibaki himself, has made a passionate public plea to
Kenyans to reduce their alcohol intake. Leading local
cell phone provider, Safaricom, announced a record
half year net profit of approximately US $ 28.75
million, as it’s customer base fast approaches the 2
million mark. A 1988 article on Mercedes Benz in the
reputed “Economist” magazine mentioned Mercedes as the
status symbol vehicle in Frankfurt, London and
Nairobi, a situation that still prevails in Nairobi,
17 years later. Nairobi is currently reputed to have a
grater density of Mercedes Benz vehicles per square
kilometre, than London. Many more Kenyans in general
own a wide variety of classy vehicles of one kind of
another, than they did 17 years ago. There has also
been rapid growth in hawking in this country over the
last 11 years. Products ranging from clothing, brand
new or used, to electronics, are readily retailed, a
sound indication of high impulsive consumer
expenditure. This consumerism and it’s preference for
foreign products, has been the regrettable cause of
the collapse of local manufacturing concerns such as
Kisumu Cotton Mills (KICOMI) and Rift Valley Textiles
(RIVATEX), over the years.

The massive consumer expenditure in Kenya, which has
no long term benefit, requires to be converted to
development expenditure for the long term benefit of
this country. The highly risky and successful rescue
mission of Israeli hostages from Uganda’s Entebbe
airport by Israeli commandoes in 1976, ignited fierce
gratitude, nationalism and patriotism, to the extent
that Israelis reached into their pockets to contribute
$ 3 million to a voluntary defense fund. The exchange
rate in 1976 was seven Kenya shillings to one US
dollar, which means that US $ 3 million in 1976,
roughly equates to US $ 34 million in 2005, a figure
marginally above the US $ 28.75 million we have helped
Safaricom make in half a year. Were we to follow the
Israeli example and reach into our pockets to
contribute US $ 34 million to voluntarily revamp the
education sector, infrastructure and the economy at
large, this country would transform favourably
remarkably.


Michael Mundia Kamau